|
|
|
 |
| The
idea for the film "Angry Monk — Reflections on
Tibet" originated during several trips to China, Tibet
and India between 1988 and 1999. Without being aware of it,
I travelled to the same places that the protagonist of the
movie visited 50 years before. Since 1988 I have been studying
the country of Tibet and how the western world perceives it.
And I repeatedly came across the name of Gendun Choephel. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gendun Choephel,
1950 |
|
Potala Palace, 2002 |
|
Monk policeman in
lhasa, 1949 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Gendun Choephel
(1903-51) was a wanderer between worlds — at once a dreamer,
a rebel and a researcher. He lived in a time that was decisive for
the future of his country, between the British colonial invasion
of 1903 and the occupation by the Chinese army in 1951. At that
time Tibet wasn’t the inaccessible Shangri-La that people
often claim, but a torn country on the verge of big changes. Tibet’s
attempts to introduce a new social structure and to find its own
way into the twentieth century failed because of the resistance
of the conservative nobility and the monasteries.
As Tibet moved towards isolation, Gendun
Choephel was open to new experiences. We can trace his path through
his writings, articles, pictures and sketches. He looked at his
own society in a critical way, was interested in political issues
and tried to apply them to everyday life; he was, therefore, the
initiator of critical and intellectual thought within Tibetan society.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Zhöpang, 1999 |
|
Milarepa, the crazy
saint |
|
Party member's card,
1946 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ANGRY MONK
Reflections on Tibet
a film by Luc Schaedler
Switzerland 2005
1:1,85 • 35mm • Colours
97 minutes • Ov/d |
|
|
|
During his last
years, Gendun Choephel became a role model for many young Tibetans
in Chinese-occupied Tibet and also for those in exile in India.
While their parents lost Tibet, the younger generation looked for
role models that would allow a critical view of their own society.
But the western world only slowly became aware of Choephel because
his life story doesn’t mesh with our rigid image of Tibet,
which prefers to portray Tibetans as victims rather than the makers
of their own history.
Luc Schaedler
|
|
|